State v. Thomas ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                                 633
    Submitted February 7, reversed and remanded March 4, 2020
    STATE OF OREGON,
    Plaintiff-Respondent,
    v.
    ASHLEY T. THOMAS,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    Douglas County Circuit Court
    18VI208667; A170251
    458 P3d 733
    Jason R. Thomas, Judge pro tempore.
    Ashley Thomas filed the brief pro se.
    Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman,
    Solicitor General, and Christopher A. Perdue, Assistant
    Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
    Before DeVore, Presiding Judge, and DeHoog, Judge, and
    Mooney, Judge.
    PER CURIAM
    Reversed and remanded.
    634                                            State v. Thomas
    PER CURIAM
    Defendant appeals a judgment convicting her of
    speeding. ORS 811.111. Defendant was issued a citation on
    December 6, 2018. On January 8, 2019, she filed a plea of
    not guilty and requested a trial. On January 9, 2019, the
    court sent out a notice of trial scheduled for February 4,
    2019. However, in preparing the notice, the court clerk mis-
    transcribed defendant’s address. The notice was returned to
    the court on January 15, 2019, indicating “return to sender,
    insufficient address.” On February 4, 2019, the court held
    a trial in defendant’s absence, convicted her of the offense,
    issued notice of suspension her driver’s license, and imposed
    a fine of $1,150.
    On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court
    erred in holding a trial and convicting her in her absence
    because she was not given adequate notice of the trial. The
    state concedes the error, noting that, under ORS 153.073,
    unless notice is waived by the defendant, the court is
    required to provide the defendant with “notice of the date,
    time and place at least five days before the date set for trial,”
    and, in cases involving traffic violations, the notice must
    contain a warning that, if the defendant fails to appear, the
    defendant’s driving privileges are subject to suspension. We
    agree and accept the state’s concession. See generally State
    v. Worthington, 
    255 Or App 177
    , 296 P3d 624 (2013) (revers-
    ing and remanding in a traffic violation case where there
    was no evidence that the defendant received notice at least
    five days before the date set for trial).
    Reversed and remanded.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A170251

Filed Date: 3/4/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/10/2024