State v. Rose ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                                    811
    Submitted March 31; remanded for entry of judgment omitting condition that
    defendant not use or possess alcohol on Count 1 in Case Number MI150079 and
    Count 1 in Case Number 16CR02091, otherwise affirmed April 29, 2020
    STATE OF OREGON,
    Plaintiff-Respondent,
    v.
    RICHARD ANDREW ROSE,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    Deschutes County Circuit Court
    MI150079, 16CR02091;
    A168336 (Control), A168337
    461 P3d 1109
    A. Michael Adler, Judge.
    Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate
    Section, and David Sherbo-Huggins, Deputy Public Defender,
    Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.
    Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman,
    Solicitor General, and Greg Rios, Assistant Attorney
    General, filed the brief for respondent.
    Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Shorr, Judge, and
    James, Judge.
    PER CURIAM
    Remanded for entry of judgment omitting condition that
    defendant not use or possess alcohol on Count 1 in Case
    Number MI150079 and Count 1 in Case Number 16CR02091;
    otherwise affirmed.
    812                                              State v. Rose
    PER CURIAM
    In this consolidated appeal, defendant appeals from
    two judgments of conviction. In Case Number MI150079,
    defendant was convicted of driving under the influence of
    intoxicants (DUII) (Count 1). In Case Number 16CR02091,
    defendant was convicted of DUII (Count 1) and assault in
    the third degree (Counts 3 and 5). Defendant pleaded guilty
    to those counts. Defendant’s appeal raises various chal-
    lenges to his resulting sentence, including that the 62-month
    aggregate sentence of incarceration was constitutionally
    disproportionate and that the trial court erred in imposing
    sentencing restrictions. We reject all of defendant’s argu-
    ments without further written discussion save one, that the
    trial court plainly erred by imposing a mandatory sentenc-
    ing condition on both DUII counts that was not permitted
    by statute. We thus remand to the trial court with instruc-
    tions to delete the mandatory condition on those counts that
    defendant not use or possess alcohol.
    Defendant contends that the trial court plainly
    erred in imposing “sentencing instructions” that defendant
    not use or possess alcohol because defendant received a
    “straight-jail” sentence with no probation and, therefore,
    could not be subjected to additional conditions. The state
    concedes that the court erred because it lacked the sentenc-
    ing authority to impose a mandatory incarceration restric-
    tion. ORS 137.010(7) (providing that, when a court does not
    suspend the imposition or execution of any sentence, the
    court “shall” impose a term of imprisonment, a fine, both,
    or discharge of the defendant); State v. Easton, 
    295 Or App 137
    , 138, 431 P3d 465 (2018) (remanding for modification of
    incarceration conditions because the trial court exceeded its
    sentencing authority). The state contends that the proper
    remedy is a limited remand to strike the improperly imposed
    sentencing restriction.
    We accept the state’s concession, conclude that the
    trial court plainly erred, and exercise our discretion to cor-
    rect that error. See State v. Reed, 
    235 Or App 470
    , 475-76, 237
    P3d 826 (2010) (exercising discretion to correct plainly erro-
    neous mandatory condition of post-prison supervision). As a
    result, we remand to the trial court to delete the improper
    Cite as 
    303 Or App 811
     (2020)                         813
    sentencing condition on the DUII counts that defendant not
    use or possess alcohol.
    Remanded for entry of judgment omitting condi-
    tion that defendant not use or possess alcohol on Count 1
    in Case Number MI150079 and Count 1 in Case Number
    16CR02091; otherwise affirmed.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A168336

Filed Date: 4/29/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/10/2024