State v. Cayson ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                                    98
    Submitted November 8; convictions on Counts 3 and 6 reversed and remanded,
    remanded for resentencing, otherwise affirmed December 1, 2021
    STATE OF OREGON,
    Plaintiff-Respondent,
    v.
    SENECA HONJUAY ISAIAH CAYSON,
    aka Seneca Honjuay Isiah Cayson,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    Washington County Circuit Court
    18CR15470; A172919
    500 P3d 773
    Oscar Garcia, Judge.
    Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate
    Section, and Kristin A. Carveth, Deputy Public Defender,
    Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.
    Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman,
    Solicitor General, and Kirsten M. Naito, Assistant Attorney
    General, filed the brief for respondent.
    Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Shorr, Judge, and
    Powers, Judge.
    PER CURIAM
    Convictions on Counts 3 and 6 reversed and remanded;
    remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.
    Cite as 
    316 Or App 98
     (2021)                               99
    PER CURIAM
    Defendant was convicted based on unanimous
    jury verdicts on two counts of second-degree kidnapping
    (Counts 1 and 2), one count of strangulation (Count 4), and
    one count of fourth-degree assault constituting domestic vio-
    lence (Count 5). He also was convicted based on nonunan-
    imous jury verdicts of coercion (Count 3) and menacing
    constituting domestic violence (Count 6). He argues on
    appeal that the court erred denying his request for a jury-
    unanimity instruction, and instructing the jury it could
    return nonunanimous verdicts, which was erroneous under
    Ramos v. Louisiana, 
    590 US ___
    , 
    140 S Ct 1390
    , 
    206 L Ed 2d 583
     (2020). The state concedes the error, and we conclude
    that defendant is entitled to reversal of the nonunanimous
    guilty verdicts on Counts 3 and 6. Defendant also argues
    that the erroneous instruction entitles him to reversal of all
    of his convictions because it constituted structural error. We
    reject that argument for the reasons set forth in State v.
    Flores Ramos, 
    367 Or 292
    , 319, 478 P3d 515 (2020).
    Convictions on Counts 3 and 6 reversed and
    remanded; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A172919

Filed Date: 12/1/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/10/2024