Dept. of Human Services v. A. A. D. , 321 Or. App. 394 ( 2022 )

394
This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion
pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited
except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
Submitted May 20, affirmed August 10, 2022
In the Matter of A. M. T. D.,
a Child.
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,
Petitioner-Respondent,
v.
A. A. D.,
Appellant.
Marion County Circuit Court
21JU01468; A177380 (Control)
In the Matter of C. S. A. D.,
a Child.
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,
Petitioner-Respondent,
v.
A. A. D.,
Appellant.
Marion County Circuit Court
21JU01471; A177382
In the Matter of D. A. J. D.,
a Child.
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,
Petitioner-Respondent,
v.
A. A. D.,
Appellant.
Marion County Circuit Court
21JU01472; A177383
Nonprecedential Memo Op: 321 Or App 394 (2022) 395
In the Matter of J. P. R. D.,
a Child.
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,
Petitioner-Respondent,
v.
A. A. D.,
Appellant.
Marion County Circuit Court
21JU01474; A177384
Tracy A. Prall, Judge.
Shannon Storey, Chief Defender, Juvenile Appellate
Section, and Sarah Peterson, Deputy Public Defender, Office
of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman,
Solicitor General, and Colm Moore, Assistant Attorney
General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Shorr, Presiding Judge, and Mooney, Judge, and
Pagán, Judge.
PAGÁN, J.
Affirmed.
396 Dept. of Human Services v. A. A. D.
PAGÁN, J.
Mother appeals from judgments terminating her
parental rights to her four children, J, A, D, and C. The
juvenile court concluded that mother was “unfit by reason
of conduct or condition seriously detrimental to the child”
and that integration of the children into mother’s home was
improbable within “a reasonable time due to conduct or con-
ditions not likely to change.” ORS 419B.504. The court fur-
ther concluded that termination of parental rights to each
of the children was in the best interest of the children. ORS
419B.500.
We have reviewed the record de novo. The evidence
in the record supports a determination that mother’s con-
duct, which included substance abuse, neglect, and crimi-
nal conduct, was seriously detrimental to her children. ORS
419B.504(1). We further conclude, as did the juvenile court,
that reintegration to mother’s home is improbable within a
reasonable time due to conduct or conditions which are not
likely to change, and that termination of mother’s parental
rights is in the best interest of each child.
Affirmed.