Dept. of Human Services v. G. R. S. ( 2022 )

106
This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion
pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited
except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
Submitted November 9, affirmed December 7, 2022
In the Matter of A. P. P. W.,
a Child.
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,
Petitioner-Respondent,
v.
G. R. S.,
Appellant.
Douglas County Circuit Court
20JU00741; A178840 (Control)
In the Matter of T. A. W.,
a Child.
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,
Petitioner-Respondent,
v.
G. R. S.,
Appellant.
Douglas County Circuit Court
20JU00743; A178841
George William Ambrosini, Judge.
Kristen G. Williams filed the brief for appellant.
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman,
Solicitor General, and Jon Zunkel-deCoursey, Assistant
Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before Tookey, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Judge, and
Kamins, Judge.
KAMINS, J.
Affirmed.
Nonprecedential Memo Op: 323 Or App 106 (2022) 107
KAMINS, J.
Mother appeals a judgment terminating her paren-
tal rights to her two children, assigning four errors, each
of which challenges the juvenile court’s finding that it is
improbable that the children could be returned to her care
within a reasonable time. ORS 419B.504 (“The rights of the
parent or parents may be terminated as provided in ORS
419B.500 if the court finds that the parent or parents are
unfit by reason of conduct or condition seriously detrimental
to the child or ward and integration of the child or ward
into the home of the parent or parents is improbable within
a reasonable time due to conduct or conditions not likely to
change.”). Exercising de novo review, ORS 19.415(3)(a), and
having considered the entirety of the evidentiary record, we
conclude, as did the juvenile court, that there is clear and
convincing evidence that the statutory standards for termi-
nation are met.
Affirmed.