State v. Monagon ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                                    529
    Argued and submitted March 7; Counts 1 through 8 reversed and remanded,
    remanded for resentencing, otherwise affirmed May 11; petition for review
    denied October 6, 2022 (
    370 Or 303
    )
    STATE OF OREGON,
    Plaintiff-Respondent,
    v.
    VAUGHN LESLIE MONAGON,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    Yamhill County Circuit Court
    18CR05905; A173723
    508 P3d 998
    John L. Collins, Judge.
    Thaddeus Betz argued the cause and filed the briefs for
    appellant.
    Michael A. Casper, Assistant Attorney General, argued
    the cause for respondent. Also on the brief were Ellen F.
    Rosenblum, Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman,
    Solicitor General.
    Before Tookey, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Judge, and
    Kamins, Judge.
    PER CURIAM
    Counts 1 through 8 reversed and remanded; remanded
    for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.
    530                                                       State v. Monagon
    PER CURIAM
    Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for
    multiple counts of first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427.
    Counts 1 through 8 were tried to a jury, and the jury returned
    nonunanimous guilty verdicts. Counts 9 and 10 were tried
    to the court, which rendered guilty verdicts.1
    On appeal, defendant raises eight assignments
    of error. We write to address defendant’s first and second
    assignments of error and reject his third through eighth
    assignments of error without discussion.
    In his first assignment of error, defendant argues
    that the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury that,
    to find defendant guilty of Counts 1 through 8, it must do so
    unanimously. In his second assignment of error, defendant
    contends that the trial court erred in accepting a nonunan-
    imous verdict in Counts 1 through 8. The state concedes
    that the trial court erred by so failing to instruct the jury
    and by entering convictions on Counts 1 through 8 based on
    nonunanimous verdicts. In light of Ramos v. Louisiana, 
    590 US ___
    , 
    140 S Ct 1390
    , 
    206 L Ed 2d 583
     (2020), we agree
    with the state and accept those concessions.
    Counts 1 through 8 reversed and remanded; remanded
    for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.
    1
    The trial court merged Counts 9 and 10 into a single conviction.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A173723

Filed Date: 5/11/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/10/2024