Dept. of Human Services v. J. M. O. ( 2022 )

26
This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion
pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited
except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
Submitted June 23, reversed and remanded for correction of reasonable efforts
determination; otherwise affirmed July 20, 2022
In the Matter of A. N. O.,
a Child.
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,
Petitioner-Respondent,
v.
J. M. O.,
Appellant.
Jackson County Circuit Court
19JU05915; A177684
Joe M. Charter, Judge.
Shannon Storey, Chief Defender, Juvenile Appellate
Section, and Tiffany Keast, Deputy Public Defender, Office
of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.
Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman,
Solicitor General, and E. Nani Apo, Assistant Attorney
General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before James, Presiding Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge, and
Joyce, Judge.
JAMES, P. J.
Reversed and remanded for correction of reasonable efforts
determination; otherwise affirmed.
Nonprecedential Memo Op: 321 Or App 26 (2022) 27
JAMES, P. J.
Father appeals a permanency judgment continuing
child’s permanency plan as reunification. He raises a sin-
gle claim on appeal: that the record contains insufficient
evidence to support the juvenile court’s determination that
Department of Human Services (DHS) made reasonable
efforts toward reunification of child with father. DHS con-
cedes that under the particular circumstances of this case,
the record contains insufficient evidence to support the juve-
nile court’s determination. We accept the concession.
Reversed and remanded for correction of reasonable
efforts determination; otherwise affirmed.