State v. Demeritt ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •                                      245
    This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion
    pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited
    except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
    On respondent’s petition for reconsideration filed February 17; reconsideration
    allowed, former disposition (
    324 Or App 183
     (nonprecedential memorandum
    opinion)) withdrawn, portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay $7,500.00
    in restitution vacated, remanded for resentencing, otherwise affirmed
    April 12, 2023
    STATE OF OREGON,
    Plaintiff-Respondent,
    v.
    JODY ROBERT DEMERITT,
    Defendant-Appellant.
    Douglas County Circuit Court
    20CR25282; A176733
    William A. Marshall, Judge.
    Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman,
    Solicitor General, and E. Nani Apo, Assistant Attorney
    General, for petition.
    Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Powers, Judge, and
    Hellman, Judge.
    ORTEGA, P. J.
    Reconsideration allowed; former disposition withdrawn;
    portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay $7,500.00 in
    restitution vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise
    affirmed.
    246                                          State v. Demeritt
    ORTEGA, P. J.
    The state petitions for reconsideration of our deci-
    sion in State v. Demeritt, 
    324 Or App 183
     (2023) (nonpreceden-
    tial memorandum opinion), in which we accepted the state’s
    concession of error regarding a restitution award in light
    of State v. Shockey, 
    285 Or App 718
    , 398 P3d 444, adh’d to
    on recons, 
    287 Or App 236
    , 399 P3d 491 (2017). In its peti-
    tion, the state argues that our prior disposition failed to con-
    sider that an amendment to the statute relating to fines for
    wildlife violations called for a different disposition than the
    disposition from our opinion on reconsideration in Shockey.
    Although the state first brought that argument about the
    amendment to the court’s attention in its petition for recon-
    sideration, we nonetheless modify our disposition to allow
    for the parties to argue on remand for the appropriate result
    on resentencing.
    Reconsideration allowed; former disposition with-
    drawn; portion of judgment requiring defendant to pay
    $7,500.00 in restitution vacated; remanded for resentencing;
    otherwise affirmed.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: A176733

Judges: Ortega

Filed Date: 4/12/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/15/2024