State v. Humphers ( 2024 )

458 November 27, 2024 No. 851
This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion
pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited
except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE
STATE OF OREGON
STATE OF OREGON,
Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
BLAKE EDWARD HUMPHERS,
Defendant-Appellant.
Clackamas County Circuit Court
23CR26566; A182447
Kathie F. Steele, Judge.
Submitted October 11, 2024.
Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate
Section, and Matthew Blythe, Deputy Public Defender,
Oregon Public Defense Commission, filed the brief for
appellant.
Jennifer S. Lloyd, Assistant Attorney General, waived
appearance for respondent.
Before Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Egan, Judge.
LAGESEN, C. J.
Affirmed.
Nonprecedential Memo Op: 336 Or App 458 (2024) 459
LAGESEN, C. J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction entered
after he pleaded guilty to first-degree robbery, ORS 164.415;
unlawful use of a weapon, ORS 166.220; first-degree theft,
ORS 164.055; and felon in possession of a firearm, ORS
166.270. The trial court sentenced defendant to a total of
120 months in prison. Defendant’s counsel filed a brief pur-
suant to ORAP 5.90 and State v. Balfour, 311 Or 434, 814
P2d 1069 (1991). The brief does not contain a Section B. See
ORAP 5.90(1)(b). We affirm.1
Having reviewed the record, including the trial
court file, the transcript of the hearings, and the Balfour
brief, and taking into account our statutorily circumscribed
authority to review, see ORS 138.105, we have identified no
arguably meritorious issues.
Affirmed.
1
As authorized by ORS 2.570(2)(b), this matter is determined by a two-judge
panel. See, e.g., State v. Yother, 310 Or App 563, 484 P3d 1098 (2021) (deciding
matter submitted through Balfour process by two-judge panel); Ballinger v.
Nooth, 254 Or App 402, 295 P3d 115 (2012), rev den, 353 Or 747 (2013) (same).