State v. Cole ( 2024 )

No. 772 October 30, 2024 763
This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion
pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited
except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE
STATE OF OREGON
STATE OF OREGON,
Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
CAMERON PRESCOTT COLE,
aka Cameron Cole,
Defendant-Appellant.
Coos County Circuit Court
23CN02052; A181925
Martin E. Stone, Judge.
Submitted September 13, 2024.
Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate
Section, and Anna R. Johnson, Deputy Public Defender,
Oregon Public Defense Commission, filed the brief for
appellant.
Jennifer S. Lloyd, Assistant Attorney General, waived
appearance for respondent.
Before Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Egan, Judge.
LAGESEN, C. J.
Affirmed.
764 State v. Cole
LAGESEN, C. J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of contempt. His
appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to ORAP 5.90
and State v. Balfour, 311 Or 434, 814 P2d 1069 (1991). The
brief does not contain a Section B. See ORAP 5.90(1)(b). We
affirm.1
After violating a restraining order by contacting
the protected party by telephone, defendant admitted to
contempt of court. The trial court entered a judgment of con-
tempt and placed defendant on 18 months of bench proba-
tion. Having reviewed the record, including the trial court
file, the transcript of the hearings, and the Balfour brief, we
have identified no arguably meritorious issues.
Affirmed.
1
As authorized by ORS 2.570(2)(b), this matter is determined by a two-judge
panel. See, e.g., State v. Yother, 310 Or App 563, 484 P3d 1098 (2021) (deciding
matter submitted through Balfour process by two-judge panel); Ballinger v.
Nooth, 254 Or App 402, 295 P3d 115 (2012), rev den, 353 Or 747 (2013) (same).