Hoyle v. Shelton ( 2019 )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON CASEY MICHAEL HOYLE, Civ. No. 2:16-cv-1800-MK Plaintiff, ORDER v. DR. SHELTON; RN ROBERTS; RN MANEY; DR. KELLY; DR. BEAMER; NP FISHER; NP LOZIER; MS WETTLAUFER; DR. SNIDER; RN GILLESPIE; MS. SHAW, Defendants. _____________________________ MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 112), and the matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiff filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore 1 –ORDER Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 112) is adopted in full. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 61) is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 14th day of November, 2019. _______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge 2 –ORDER