Pangan v. Commissioner Social Security Administration ( 2019 )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION TONIA P.,1 No. 6:18-cv-00457-AC Plaintiff, ORDER v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendants. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation [18] on September 25, 2019, in which he recommends that the Court reverse the Commissioner’s decision and remand for further administrative proceedings. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). 1 In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non-governmental party. Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta’s Findings and Recommendation [18]. Accordingly, the Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this | Suay of | ( \| , 2019. | MARCO A. HERNANDEZ United States District Judge 2 - ORDER