Murray v. Transportation Media, Inc. ( 2019 )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON COLIN W. MURRAY, individually No. 3:19-cv-00180-JR & on behalf of all similarly situated, Plaintiff(s), v. TRANSPORTATION MEDIA, INC., d/b/a ORDER BENCH CRAFT COMPANY, Defendant. HERNANDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings & Recommendation (#63) on October 17, 2019, in which she recommends the Court grant Defendant's motion to compel arbitration on an individual basis. Plaintiff has timely filed objections to the Findings & Recommendation. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & 1 - ORDER Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). I have carefully considered Defendant's objections and conclude there is no basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. I have also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and find no other errors in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Russo's Findings & Recommendation [63], and therefore, Defendant's motion to compel arbitration on an individual basis [52] is granted. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this December 23, 2019 /V tte 4onundern MARCO A. HERNANDEZ United States District Judge 2 - ORDER