Iniguez v. Templin ( 2019 )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MIGUEL A. INIGUEZ, No. 2:17-cv-01513-SB Plaintiff, v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JERRAD ORDER TEMPLIN, Defendant. HERNANDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation (#46) on November 4, 2019, in which she recommends that this Court dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna- Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's 1 - ORDER report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman's Findings & Recommendation [46]. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Complaint [2] is dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED December 15, 2019 / I tito Yonundery MARCO A. HERNANDEZ United States District Judge 2 - ORDER