Lynn v. Stross ( 2019 )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION VICKY LYNN, No. 3:19-cv-00397-JR Plaintiff, ORDER v. ALEXANDER STROSS, Defendant. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings and Recommendation [25] on October 7, 2019 in which she recommends the Court grant Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Improper Venue [13]. Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendation. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge’s report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). The Court has carefully considered Plaintiff’s objections and concludes that the objections do not provide a basis to modify the recommendation. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and finds no error in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation. CONCLUSION The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Russo’s Findings and Recommendation [25]. Accordingly, Defendant’s motion to dismiss [13] is granted and this action is dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 11/30/2019 MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge