- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON CHRISTOPHER M. ZEHNER, Civil No. 6:18-CV-01712-AA Plaintiff, v. ORDER FOR EAJA FEES COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Defendant. For the reasons set forth in the parties’ stipulated motion for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, et seq., and good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: Plaintiff is here by awarded $7,000 in fees and expenses under the EAJA. Under Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2528-29 (2010), EAJA fees awarded by this Court belong to the Plaintiff and are subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. § 3716(c)(3)(B) (2006)). Any EAJA fees should therefore be awarded to Plaintiff and not to Plaintiff’ s attorney. If, after receiving the Court’ s EAJA fee order, the Commissioner (1) determines that Plaintiff has assigned her right to EAJA fees to her attorney; (2) determines that Plaintiff does not owe a debt that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, and (3) agrees to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, then the EAJA fees will be made payable to Plaintiff’ s attorney. However, if there is a debt owed under the Treasury Offset Program, the Commissioner cannot agree to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, and the remaining EAJA fees after offset will be paid by a check made out to Plaintiff but delivered to Plaintiff’ s attorney. IT IS SO ORDERED this ___1_0_th____ day of December , 2020. __/s_/_A_n_n_ A__ik_e_n_________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Submitted by: BILLY J. WILLIAMS, OSB #901366 United States Attorney RENATA GOWIE, OSB #175273 Civil Chief s/ Lars J. Nelson LARS J. NELSON Special Assistant United States Attorney of Attorneys for Defendant (206) 615-3717
Document Info
Docket Number: 6:18-cv-01712-AA
Filed Date: 12/10/2020
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 6/27/2024