Ducham v. Commissioner Social Security Administration ( 2021 )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON KAREN D.1, No. 3:19-cv-00143-AC Plaintiff, ORDER v. COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation on October 19, 2020, in which he recommends that this Court affirm the Commissioner’s decision. F&R, ECF 14. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation. Pl. Obj., ECF 16. When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & 1 In the interest of privacy, this order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non-governmental party or parties in this case. Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge’s report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). The Court has carefully considered Plaintiff’s objections and concludes that there is no basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and finds no error in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation. CONCLUSION The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Acosta’s Findings and Recommendation [14]. Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner is affirmed, and this case is dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 6, 2021 ___________________________ MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge