Cannon v. Long ( 2020 )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON DAVID LEE CANNON, No. 06:19-cv-00028-JR Plaintiff, ORDER v. DENNIS BUCKMASTER; DAVID LONG; RUSHEL KISER; and PAGE BEUTLER, Defendants. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings and Recommendation on April 27, 2020, in which she recommends that this Court grant Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and dismiss this case. F&R, ECF 44. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation. Pl. Obj., ECF 46. When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge’s report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). The Court has carefully considered Plaintiff’s objections and concludes that there is no basis to modify the Findings & Recommendation. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and finds no error in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings & Recommendation. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Russo’s Findings and Recommendation [44]. Therefore, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [36] is GRANTED and this action is dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: ___D_e_c_e_m__b_e_r_ 2_1__, _2_0_2_0____. ___________________________ MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge