Salmon v. Ventura ( 2021 )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON RICHARD W. SALMON, No. 2:19-cv-01878-AC Plaintiff, ORDER v. MARCIA G. VENTURA, Statewide Inmate ADA Coordinator, Defendant. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation on February 8, 2021, in which he recommends that the Court grant Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint. F&R, ECF No. 20. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Acosta’s Findings and Recommendation [No.20]. Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Salmon’s Amended Complaint [No. 12] is granted. Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: ____J_u_l_y_ 8_,_ 2_0__2_1____________. MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge