Krueger v. New Directions Northwest, Inc. ( 2019 )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON TIMOTHY ANDREW KRUEGER, No. 2:19-cv-00058-SU an individual, Plaintiff, v. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF ORDER CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. HERNANDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Sullivan issued a Findings and Recommendation (#27) on August 15, 2019, in which she recommends that this Court grant Defendant Washburn's motion to dismiss with leave to amend. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna- Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's 1 - ORDER report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Sullivan's Findings & Recommendation [27]. Accordingly, Defendant Washburn's motion to dismiss [22] is granted with leave to amend in accordance with the pleading requirements as outlined in the Findings & Recommendation. Any amended complaint is due within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 4 day of _[ ) | , 2019. MARCO A. HERNANDEZ United States District Judge 2 - ORDER