Givens v. Multnomah County Sheriff ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON TORIANDRE GIVENS, No. 3:21-cv-01476-YY Plaintiff, ORDER v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY SHERIFF; SERGEANT KURTISS MORRISON; LT. POOLE; SGT. BRITTON; SGT. OLSEN; SGT. SCOTT, Defendants. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge You issued a Findings and Recommendation on December 13, 2022, in which she recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion to Object. F&R, ECF 24. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge’s report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error. CONCLUSION The Court adopts Magistrate Judge You’s Findings and Recommendation [24]. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Object [8] is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: ____J_a_n_u_a_r_y_ 1_8__, _2_0_2_3________. A@(:/() `` MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge

Document Info

Docket Number: 3:21-cv-01476

Filed Date: 1/18/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/27/2024