Wong v. Fagan ( 2023 )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON MEI WONG; DANA HINDMAN-ALLEN, No. 3:22-cv-01714-SB Plaintiffs, ORDER v. SHEMIA FAGAN; DEBORAH SCROGGIN; ALMA WHALEN; BOB ROBERTS; SHERRY HALL; REBEKAH DOLL; CLACKAMAS COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICE; and THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE STATE OF OREGON, Defendants. HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Magistrate Judge Beckerman issued a Findings and Recommendation on June 30, 2023, in which she recommends that this Court dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint with prejudice. F&R, ECF 25. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Plaintiffs filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation. Pl. Obj., ECF 27. When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge’s report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). The Court has carefully considered Plaintiffs’ objections and concludes that there is no basis to modify the Findings and Recommendation. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and finds no error in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation. CONCLUSION The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Beckerman’s Findings and Recommendation [25]. Therefore, Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss [13] is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: ___S_e_p_t_e_m__b_e_r _4_,_ 2_0_2_3_____. ___________________________ MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ United States District Judge