-
DECISION OF DISMISSAL This matter is before the court on its own motion to dismiss this case for lack of prosecution.A case management conference was scheduled at 2:15 p. m. on July 7, 2011, to consider Plaintiff's appeal. On May 18, 2011, the court sent notice of the scheduled case management conference to Plaintiff at the email address Plaintiff provided to the court. The notice was not returned as undeliverable. The notice advised that, if Plaintiff did not appear, the court might dismiss the appeal.
On July 7, 2011, the court sent Plaintiff a letter which explained the importance of diligently pursuing an appeal. That letter was sent to 5827 SW Menlo Dr. Apt 45, Beaverton, OR 97005, the address Plaintiff provided with his Complaint. That letter was not returned as undeliverable. The letter advised that, if Plaintiff did not provide a written explanation by July 21, 2011, for his failure to appear, the court would dismiss the appeal. As of this date, Plaintiff has not submitted a written response to the court explaining his failure to appear at the *Page 2 July 7, 2011, case management conference. Under such circumstances, the court finds the appeal must be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Now, therefore,
IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that the Complaint is dismissed.
Dated this ____ day of July 2011.
If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in theRegular Division of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to:1163 State Street, Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor,1241 State Street, Salem, OR. Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the dateof the Decision or this Decision becomes final and cannot bechanged. This document was signed by Magistrate Dan Robinsonon July 27, 2011. The Court filed and entered this documenton July 27, 2011.
*Page 1
Document Info
Docket Number: TC-MD 110236C.
Judges: DAN ROBINSON, Magistrate.
Filed Date: 7/27/2011
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/6/2016