Perez v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 100111b (or.tax 6-10-2010) ( 2010 )


Menu:
  • DECISION OF DISMISSAL
    This matter is before the court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on the ground that Plaintiff failed to appeal within the 90 days required by ORS 305.280(2).

    A review of Plaintiff's materials shows the Notice of Deficiency Assessment was mailed to Plaintiff on August 18, 2009. The Complaint was filed on March 4, 2010. That interval is longer than the 90 days required by ORS 305.280(2) (2009), which provides:

    "An appeal under ORS 323.416 or 323.623 or from any notice of assessment or refund denial issued by the Department of Revenue with respect to a tax imposed under ORS chapter 118, 308, 308A, 310, 314, 316, 317, 318, 321 or this chapter, or collected pursuant to ORS 305.620, shall be filed within 90 days after the date of the notice. An appeal from a proposed adjustment under ORS 305.270 shall be filed within 90 days after the date the notice of adjustment is final."

    The court is not aware of any circumstances that extend the statutory limit of 90 days. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is granted. Now, therefore, *Page 2

    IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is allowed. The Complaint is dismissed.

    Dated this ___ day of June 2010.

    If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in theRegular Division of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to:1163 State Street, Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to:Fourth Floor, 1241 State Street, Salem, OR. Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the dateof the Decision or this Decision becomes final and cannot bechanged. This document was signed by Magistrate Jeffrey S. Mattsonon June 10, 2010. The court filed and entered this documenton June 10, 2010.

Document Info

Docket Number: TC-MD 100111B.

Judges: JEFFREY S. MATTSON, Magistrate.

Filed Date: 6/10/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/6/2016