Asmar v. Department of Revenue ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                  IN THE OREGON TAX COURT
    MAGISTRATE DIVISION
    Property Tax
    ALICE ASMAR,                                        )
    )
    Plaintiff,                          )   TC-MD 111212C
    )
    v.                                          )
    )
    DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,                              )
    State of Oregon                                     )
    )
    Defendant.                          )   DECISION OF DISMISSAL
    This matter is before the court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Motion), filed
    April 11, 2012, and its Answer, filed December 5, 2011, requesting that the court “uphold the
    Department of Revenue’s Notice of Account Inactivation[,]” dated September 21, 2011. (Def’s
    Answer at 2.)
    A case management conference was held on March 19, 2012. Plaintiff appeared on her
    own behalf. Kathy Stevens appeared on behalf of Defendant. During the conference, Plaintiff’s
    letter, dated November 14, 2011, was reviewed; it states:
    “The house we’re talking about is the house my parents bought in 1958 and lived
    in it until my father’s death in 1971 and my mother’s death in 2005. * * * While I
    might not live in the house physically I live in it spiritually. * * * At present I’m
    thinking about moving back to that house – but as you can imagine an 82 year old
    living by herself! That wish seems overwhelming.
    “When I did rent the house this year, I spent a year finding the right
    tenants for the house. I finally selected four young students who are highly
    responsible and are attending art school in Portland.”
    In its Motion, Defendant referenced ORS 311.670(1), stating that a “[p]roperty is not eligible for
    tax deferral under ORS 311.666 to 311.701 unless, at the time a claim is filed and during the
    period for which deferral is claimed: (a) The property has been the homestead of the individual
    who files the claim for deferral for at least five years . . .” (Def’s Mot at 1.)
    DECISION OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 111212C                                                               1
    The parties agreed, and the court’s Journal Entry, filed March 20, 2012, stated that
    Plaintiff was to submit a written statement setting forth the reasons she qualified for the Senior
    Property Tax Deferral Program no later than April 19, 2012. In her letter, dated March 22, 2012,
    Plaintiff wrote:
    “I hereby request that my appeal be adjudicated on the basis of my
    original application of February 9, 2011.
    “Your attempt to deceive an 83 year old woman is not worthy of the state
    of Oregon which I love dearly.”
    In response, Defendant filed its Motion, stating that “[t]he department received a copy of a letter
    to the court from Ms. Asmar on March 26, 2012, but the letter does not provide any information
    regarding her residency or qualification.” (Def’s Mot at 1.)
    Plaintiff filed an application to defer her property taxes for property identified as Account
    R307672 (subject property). Based on the information stated in Plaintiff’s letter dated
    November 14, 2011, Plaintiff does not reside in the subject property. Plaintiff rents the subject
    property to four individuals. ORS 311.670(1)(a) states, in pertinent part, that a “[p]roperty is not
    eligible for tax deferral under ORS 311.666 to 311.701 unless, at the time a claim is filed and
    during the period for which deferral is claimed: (a) The property has been the homestead of the
    individual or individuals who file the claim for deferral for at least five years preceding April 15
    of the year in which the claim is filed.” 1, 2 Plaintiff has presented no evidence that the subject
    property has been her “homestead * * * for at least five years preceding April 15 of the year in
    which the claim is filed.” Plaintiff has stated that she rents the subject property to others and
    ///
    1
    All references to the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) are to 2011.
    2
    “The amendments to * * * [ORS] 311.670 * * * apply to property tax years beginning on or after July 1,
    2011.” Or Laws 2011, ch 723, § 24.
    DECISION OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 111212C                                                                               2
    does not “physically” live in the subject property. Plaintiff has not carried her burden of proof.
    Now, therefore,
    IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that this matter be dismissed.
    Dated this      day of May 2012.
    JILL A. TANNER
    PRESIDING MAGISTRATE
    If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in the Regular Division of
    the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street, Salem, OR 97301-2563;
    or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 State Street, Salem, OR.
    Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of the Decision
    or this Decision becomes final and cannot be changed.
    This document was signed by Presiding Magistrate Jill A. Tanner on May 1,
    2012. The Court filed and entered this document on May 1, 2012.
    DECISION OF DISMISSAL TC-MD 111212C                                                                  3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: TC-MD 111212C

Filed Date: 5/1/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/11/2024