Crew v. Clackamas County Assessor ( 2013 )

IN THE OREGON TAX COURT
MAGISTRATE DIVISION
Property Tax
JON W. CREW and BOBBE W. CREW, )
)
Plaintiffs, ) TC-MD 120815N
)
v. )
)
CLACKAMAS COUNTY ASSESSOR, )
)
Defendant. ) DECISION
This matter is before the court on Defendant’s motion to dismiss, filed with its Answer on
December 5, 2012. The parties discussed the motion to dismiss during the case management
conference held in this matter on December 31, 2012. The parties subsequently filed additional
written arguments on the motion to dismiss.
On its own motion, the court considers whether Defendant’s disqualification letter
complied with applicable statutes and rules. On March 7, 2013, the court sent a letter to the
parties requesting written statements on whether Defendant’s June 27, 2012, disqualification
letter meets the requirements of ORS 308A.718 and OAR 150-308A.718. Plaintiff Jon W. Crew
filed a written statement on March 26, 2013. Defendant did not file a written statement.
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS
Plaintiffs appeal from Defendant’s letter, dated June 27, 2012, which stated:
“In accordance with ORS 321.716, 8.94 acres of [property identified as Account
00129382 (subject property)] will be removed from Special Assessment as Small
Tract Forestland, effective as of January 1, 2012, because the land no longer
qualifies as forestland. Real Market Value will replace Small Tract Forest values
for the 2012-2013 Assessment Year.
“The additional tax of $262.05 required by ORS 308A.703 will be added to the
taxes extended against the property on the 2012-2013 tax roll. This tax will
appear on your 2012-2013 tax statement, which you will receive in late October
2012. * * * .
DECISION TC-MD 120815N 1
“Your disqualified land is not eligible for special assessment as Small Tract
Forestland for a period of five years as required by ORS 321.709. However, all or
a portion of the acreage may qualify for another special assessment. When land is
disqualified under ORS 308A.706, an application may be submitted for another
program within 30 days of the date on the notice.
“Any appeal from this decision must be filed with the Oregon Tax Court in the
Magistrate Division within 90 days of the postmark date on this letter. * * * .”
(Ptfs’ Compl at 5; Def’s Arg in Support of Mot to Dismiss at Ex A, Jan 9, 2013.)
With their Complaint, Plaintiffs attached a second letter from Defendant, entitled
“Declassification of Special Assessment 2012-2013,” also dated June 27, 2012. (Ptfs’ Compl at
6.) It is unclear if or when that letter was sent to Plaintiffs.1 The letter indicated that 8.94 acres
of the subject property would be removed from “Western Oregon Designated Forestland.” (Id.)
It stated the “Reason for Declass” as “Western Oregon Designated Forestland – ORS 321.367
Minimum stocking.” (Id.) The letter stated:
“The additional tax, required under Oregon Law, will be added to the taxes
extended against this property, and will appear on your 2012-2013 property tax
statement which you will receive at the end of October 2012. * * *.
“Real market value will replace your previously deferred value and a new
assessed value, under Measure 50 guidelines, will be calculated for the 2012
assessment year. Any appeal from this decision must be filed with the Oregon
Tax Court in the Magistrate Division within 90 days of the postmark date on this
letter. If you wish to make application for classification under another special
assessment, you may do so within 30 days of the date on this letter. * * *.”
(Id.) A “Tax Due” was calculated for each of the 2007-08 through 2011-12 tax years, with a
“Total Gross Tax - all years” of $4,011.85. (Id.)
///
1
In its Argument in Support of Motion to Dismiss, Defendant provided as an exhibit the “letter notifying
the Plaintiff of the declass [that] was mailed on June 27, 2012 * * *.” (Def’s Arg in Support of Mot to Dismiss,
Jan 9, 2013.) Defendant did not attach or make reference to the “Declassification of Special Assessment 2012-
2013” letter that was included with Plaintiffs’ Complaint.
DECISION TC-MD 120815N 2
The 2012-13 property tax statement for the subject property stated total taxes due of
$5,807.20. (Ptfs’ Compl at 4.) Included in that total was $4,011.85 for “DECLASS FOREST”
and $262.05 for “DECLASS STF.” (Id.)
In support of its motion to dismiss, Defendant stated that the
“letter notifying [] Plaintiff[s] of the declass was mailed on June 27, 2012 and
stated that any appeal from [that] decision must be filed with the Oregon Tax
Court in the Magistrate Division within 90 days. Per ORS 305.275 and 305.280,
any person aggrieved by an act or determination of the assessor may appeal to the
magistrate within 90 days of the act of determination.”
(Def’s Arg in Support of Mot to Dismiss, Jan 9, 2013.) Defendant further noted that Plaintiffs
had 30 days from the date of the notice “to apply for another special assessment.” (Id.)
In Plaintiffs’ Complaint, Plaintiff Jon W. Crew (Crew) reported that he talked with Julie
Kuehl (Kuehl), Appraiser for Defendant, at some point in April 2012 about changing the subject
property to “farm special assessment.” (Ptfs’ Compl at 2.) Crew stated that he understood from
that conversation that a portion of the subject property “would be rolled over into farm land
special assessment.” (Id.) Additionally, he stated that Kuehl told him that “a letter would come
discussing the specifics.” (Id.) Plaintiffs argue that they were
“misled by the Clackamas county assigned representative by stating the increase
in the amount of taxes due would be under $300.00 since it would go into special
assessment farm land. Additionally, in April 2012 [Crew] was told that a letter
stating the difference would be mailed. [] On return to Oregon in late June, the
letter had still not been received. Upon contacting Clackamas County Senior
Appraiser, [Crew] again was told the additional taxes would be under $300.00 and
that the letter would be sent out in a batch mailing. The fact that it was going to
be mailed out in less than a week, or at least by the mandated deadline of July
15th was omitted.”
(Ptfs’ Ltr at 1, Feb 11, 2013.) Crew stated that he “did not actually know of the [June 27, 2012,]
letter until just after the 1st of November due to [his] being out of state for an extended period.
An appeal was initiated within days from the time [he] received the letter.” (Id.) Crew stated
DECISION TC-MD 120815N 3
that Plaintiffs received their property tax statement for the subject property in “late October”
2012 and observed that the “tax went from $355.20 to $5986.81.” (Ptfs’ Compl at 2.) Plaintiffs’
Complaint was filed with this court on November 14, 2012.2
II. ANALYSIS
Defendant filed a motion to dismiss asserting that Plaintiffs’ appeal was not filed within
the time allowed under ORS 305.280. However, as discussed below, Defendant’s June 27, 2012,
disqualification letter failed to comply with the applicable statute and administrative rule. As a
result, the court concludes that Defendant failed to provide valid notice of its disqualification of
the subject property from small tract forestland special assessment. Defendant’s motion to
dismiss is, therefore, moot.
Defendant’s June 27, 2012, letter stated that it was issued pursuant to ORS 321.716.
ORS 321.716(1)3 sets forth circumstances under which “[t]he county assessor shall disqualify
land as small tract forestland[.]” ORS 321.716(4) states that, “[u]pon disqualification of land
under subsection (1) of this section, additional taxes shall be determined as provided in ORS
308A.700 to 308A.733.” When property is disqualified from small tract forestland special
assessment or Western Oregon designated forestland special assessment, notice of the
disqualification must be provided under ORS 308A.718. ORS 308A.718(1)(c), (e). The
statutory requirements under ORS 308A.718 are supplemented by an administrative rule
promulgated by the Department of Revenue, OAR 150-308A.718.
///
2
ORS 305.418(1) states that a complaint will be deemed filed “on the date shown by the post-office
cancellation mark stamp upon the envelope containing [the complaint].” Thus it is the postmark date that controls
the determination of filing date.
3
All references to the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) and the Oregon Administrative Rules are to the 2011
version unless otherwise noted.
DECISION TC-MD 120815N 4
ORS 308A.718(3) states: “Within 30 days after the date that land is disqualified from
special assessment, the assessor shall notify the taxpayer in writing of the disqualification and
shall state the reason for disqualification.” See also OAR 150-308A.718(2)(a) (the notice “must
state” that “the subject property has been disqualified from special assessment”). “ ‘Shall’ is a
command: it is used in laws, regulations, or directives to express what is mandatory.” Preble v.
Dept. of Rev. (Preble), 331 Or 320, 324, 14 P3d 613 (2000) (citations omitted).
In Eby v. Dept. of Rev. (Eby), 15 OTR 247, 251 (2000), this court found that the county
assessor’s notice failed to comply with the predecessor statute to ORS 308A.718 because the
“notice erroneously indicated that the land was being disqualified under ORS 215.263, when it
should have stated that the land had been disqualified under ORS 308.397.” (Emphasis in
original.) The court explained that “the owner needs to understand that the action has been
taken, not that it will be taken. * * * By requiring the assessor to disqualify the property first and
then give the owner notice of that action, the statute contemplates that the owner will either
accept the action or appeal to this court under ORS 305.275.” Id. The court noted that, under
ORS 305.280(1), the property owner has 90 days to file an appeal from the date that the “owner
learns of the disqualification.” Id.“If the owner is distracted or lulled into inaction in the hope that discussions with
the assessor’s office will change the outcome, the appeal period may expire
before the owner realizes that disqualification is an accomplished fact. If the
appeal period expires, the owner is time barred from obtaining any relief.”
Id. Here, as in Eby, Defendant’s June 27, 2012, letter stated that the subject property “will be
removed from Special Assessment as Small Tract Forestland.”4 (Emphasis added.) Defendant’s
///
4
Defendant’s “Declassification of Special Assessment 2012-2013” letter includes the same statement as the
June 27, 2012, letter. It also fails to state that the subject property “had been” disqualified from western Oregon
forestland special assessment.
DECISION TC-MD 120815N 5
letter failed to state that the subject property “had been” disqualified from small tract forestland
special assessment.
ORS 308A.718(3) requires the assessor to “state the reason for disqualification.” See
also Smith v. Dept. of Rev. (Smith), 17 OTR 357, 362 (2004). The June 27, 2012, letter provided
by Defendant stated that subject property will be disqualified “because the land no longer
qualifies as forestland.” Presumably, the term “forestland” is a reference to the requirement
under ORS 321.716(1)(b) that the assessor “disqualify land as small tract forestland upon * * *
[d]iscovery by the assessor that the land is no longer forestland[.]” The second letter, entitled
“Declassification of Special Assessment 2012-2013,” stated that the “Reason for Declass” was
“Western Oregon Designated Forestland - ORS 321.367 Minimum stocking.” (Compl at 6.) It is
unclear to the court why Defendant’s two letters provided different reasons for disqualification
and referenced two different special assessment programs.5
Additional disqualification notice requirements are set forth in ORS 308A.718(5)(a):
“When any land has been granted special assessment under any of the special
assessment laws listed in subsection (1) of this section and the land is disqualified
from such special assessment, the county assessor shall furnish the owner with a
written explanation summarizing:
“(A) ORS 308A.706(1)(d) (relating to change in special assessment);
“(B) ORS 308A.727 (relating to change in use to open space use special
assessment for certain golf courses);
“(C) The administrative act necessary under ORS 308A.724 to change the
property to another classification described in this paragraph; and
5
In order to qualify as “forestland” for purposes of the small tract forestland special assessment program,
land must “meet[] the definition of forestland under ORS 321.257 if the land is located in western Oregon or * * *
meet[] the definition of forestland in ORS 321.805 if located in eastern Oregon.” ORS 321.700(6). It may be that
Defendant intended to disqualify 8.94 acres of the subject property from both small tract forestland special
assessment and western Oregon forestland special assessment based on a determination that the subject property no
longer met the definition of “forestland” in ORS 321.257(2). Even if that were the case, it is unclear to the court
why the “Declassification of Special Assessment 2012-2013” stated that the reason for the disqualification from
western Oregon forestland special assessment was failure to meet the minimum stocking requirements.
DECISION TC-MD 120815N 6
“(D) The imposition of any penalties that would result from the
disqualification if no requalification or reclassification is made under one
of the other special assessment law listed in this paragraph.”
Under ORS 308A.718(5)(a)(C), the assessor must provide “a written explanation of the
administrative acts needed to change the type of special assessment. This disclosure relates to
actions required of taxpayer that must be taken within specific time frames in order for additional
taxes to be deferred.” Smith, 17 OTR at 362 (citations omitted); see also OAR 150-
308A.718(2)(d). Defendant’s June 27, 2012, letter stated: “When land is disqualified under
ORS 308A.706, an application may be submitted for another program within 30 days of the date
on the notice.”6 Defendant’s letter made no reference to ORS 308A.724 and failed to provide an
explanation of the “administrative act necessary under ORS 308A.724 to change the property to
another classification.” Thus, the letter failed to comply with ORS 308A.718(5)(a)(C).
Under ORS 308A.718(5)(a)(D), the notice must provide an explanation summarizing
“[t]he imposition of any penalties that would result from the disqualification if no requalification
or reclassification is made under one of the other special assessment laws listed in this
paragraph.” See also OAR 150-308A.718(2)(c) (the notice “must state * * * [t]he amount of the
additional tax liability that will be imposed or if the land is not used for another use the amount
of the potential additional tax liability (ORS 308A.706(1))”). This court has explained the
importance of including the amount of the additional tax in the notice:
“An owner may agree with the assessor’s action of disqualifying the property, but
may disagree with the market value estimate placed on the roll or the amount of
additional tax calculated or both. If that information is not contained in the
notice, the owner is unable to determine whether to appeal on those points.
6
Defendant’s “Declassification of Special Assessment 2012-2013” letter includes the same statement as the
June 27, 2012, letter. It also fails to include a reference to ORS 308A.724 or an explanation of “administrative act
necessary under ORS 308A.724 to change the property to another classification.”
DECISION TC-MD 120815N 7
Failure to include that information places the owner on the three-legged stool that
is missing two legs.”
Eby, 15 OTR at 252.
Defendant’s June 27, 2012, letter stated: “The additional tax of $262.05 required by
ORS 308A.703 will be added to the taxes extended against the property on the 2012-2013 tax
roll.” ORS 308A.703 does not, by its terms, apply to the disqualification of property from small
tract forestland special assessment. Rather, ORS 308A.707 sets forth the “additional taxes [that]
shall be imposed on land that is disqualified from small tract forestland special assessment under
ORS 321.712 or 321.716.” Thus, the reference in Defendant’s letter to ORS 308A.703 is in
error. Furthermore, Defendant’s June 27, 2012, letter included an incomplete statement of the
additional tax that was imposed following disqualification. Based on the “Declassification of
Special Assessment 2012-2013” letter and the property tax statement for the subject property,
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
DECISION TC-MD 120815N 8
total additional taxes of $4,273.90 were imposed.7 The June 27, 2012, letter referenced only the
additional tax of $262.05.
Under OAR 150-308A.718(2)(b), the notice of disqualification must state “[t]hat the
property will be assessed under ORS 308.156.” Defendant’s June 27, 2012, letter states “Real
Market Value will replace Small Tract Forest values for the 2012-2013 Assessment Year.” The
letter included no reference to ORS 308.156. Defendant’s “Declassification of Special
Assessment 2012-2013” letter stated: “Real market value will replace your previously deferred
value and a new assessed value, under Measure 50 guidelines, will be calculated for the 2012
assessment year.” That letter, also, made no reference to ORS 308.156.
///
7
Although it is not clearly stated in either of Defendant’s letters, it appears to the court that the “additional
tax of $262.05” is the additional tax that Defendant calculated ORS 308A.707(2)(a) which states, in part:
“The additional taxes for disqualified small tract forestland that is qualified for special assessment
under a program described in ORS 308A.706 (1)(d)(A) to (D), (F) or (G) shall be equal to the
difference between the taxes assessed against the land under ORS 321.700 to 321.754 and the
taxes that would have been assessed against the land:
“(A) Under ORS 321.257 to 321.390, if the land is located in western Oregon[.]”
In other words, when property is disqualified from small tract forestland special assessment and qualifies for another
special assessment program listed in ORS 308A.706(1)(d) (not including small tract forestland special assessment),
the additional tax imposed is the difference between taxes assessed against the property under small tract forestland
special assessment and the taxes that would have been imposed against the property if it were in western Oregon
forestland special assessment. If the property is disqualified from small tract forestland special assessment and does
not qualify for another special assessment program under ORS 308A.706(1)(d), then the additional tax due upon
disqualification will also include:
“The difference between the taxes that would have been assessed against the land under
ORS 321.257 to 321.390, if located in western Oregon, * * * and the taxes that would otherwise
have been assessed against the land, for the lesser of the number of consecutive years the land was
forestland or five years.”
ORS 308A.707(3)(a)(B). Thus, when property is disqualified from small tract forestland special assessment and
fails to qualify for another special assessment program under ORS 308A.706(1)(d), the additional tax due will also
include the difference in taxes assessed against the property under western Oregon forestland special assessment and
the taxes that would have been imposed against the property if it were not subject to any special assessment. It
appears to the court that the “Declassification of Special Assessment 2012-2013” letter was meant to be a
determination of the additional tax under ORS 308A.707(3)(a)(B), although there is no reference to that statute in
the letter.
DECISION TC-MD 120815N 9
Under OAR 150-308A.718(2)(e), the notice must state “[a]ppeal rights.” Both
Defendant’s June 27, 2012, disqualification letter and its “Declassification of Special
Assessment 2012-2013” letter stated: “Any appeal from this decision must be filed with the
Oregon Tax Court in the Magistrate Division within 90 days of the postmark date on this letter.”
That statement is incorrect. An appeal of disqualification from small tract forestland special
assessment must be filed “within 90 days after the act, omission, order or determination becomes
actually known to the person, but in no event later than one year after the act * * * or
determination has been made.” ORS 305.280(1). Neither of Defendant’s letters included a
reference to ORS 305.280(1).
Defendant’s June 27, 2012, letter disqualifying the subject property from small tract
forestland special assessment included numerous defects and does not meet the requirements of
ORS 308A.718 and OAR 150-308A.718. “Those written explanatory summaries are required by
statute and, in the court’s opinion, the failure to provide them renders the disqualification
invalid.” Smith, 17 OTR at 363, citing Preble, 331 Or at 320; see also Wengert v. Clackamas
County Assessor, TC-MD No 031131D, WL 392940 at *1-2 (Feb 27, 2004) (concluding that a
notice of disqualification was invalid for failure to “include the statutory requirements set forth
in ORS 308A.718(5)(a)”). The court concludes that Defendant’s June 27, 2012, disqualification
letter is invalid notice under ORS 308A.718 and OAR 150-308A.718.
///
///
///
///
///
DECISION TC-MD 120815N 10
III. CONCLUSION
After careful consideration, the court concludes that Defendant’s June 27, 2012, letter
disqualifying the subject property from small tract forestland special assessment failed to comply
with the requirements of ORS 308A.718 and OAR 150-308A.718. Defendant’s disqualification
is, therefore, invalid. As a result, the court concludes that Defendant’s motion to dismiss should
be denied as moot and Plaintiffs’ appeal should be granted. Now, therefore,
IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that Defendant’s motion to dismiss is denied.
IT IS FURTHER DECIDED that Plaintiffs’ appeal is granted.
Dated this day of April 2013.
ALLISON R. BOOMER
MAGISTRATE
If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in the Regular Division of
the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street, Salem, OR 97301-2563;
or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 State Street, Salem, OR.
Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of the Decision
or this Decision becomes final and cannot be changed.
This document was signed by Magistrate Allison R. Boomer on April 5, 2013.
The Court filed and entered this document on April 5, 2013.
DECISION TC-MD 120815N 11