-
Mr. Justice Butler, dissenting:
I am of opinion that the challenged ordinance is not void on its face; that in principle it does not differ from the Boston ordinance, as applied and upheld by this Court, speaking through Mr. Justice White, in Davis v. Massachusetts, 167 U. S. 43, affirming the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, speaking through Mr. Justice Holmes, in Commonwealth v. Davis, 162 Mass. 510; 39 N. E. 113, and that the decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals should be reversed.
Document Info
Docket Number: 651
Citation Numbers: 307 U.S. 496, 59 S. Ct. 954, 83 L. Ed. 1423, 1939 U.S. LEXIS 1067, 4 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 501
Judges: Hughes, Butler, Roberts, Stone, McReynolds, Black
Filed Date: 6/5/1939
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/15/2024