-
JOSEPH, C. J., dissenting.
The majority’s attempt to distinguish State v. O’Brien, 96 Or App 498, 774 P2d 1109, rev den 308 Or 466 (1989), is wholly unpersuasive. That is hardly surprising, because there is no rational way to make a distinction.
I dissent.
Document Info
Docket Number: C89-11-36711; CA A65260
Citation Numbers: 838 P.2d 1100, 115 Or. App. 440, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1852
Judges: Richardson, Joseph, Deits
Filed Date: 10/14/1992
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/13/2024