State v. Mahoney , 115 Or. App. 440 ( 1992 )


Menu:
  • JOSEPH, C. J.,

    dissenting.

    The majority’s attempt to distinguish State v. O’Brien, 96 Or App 498, 774 P2d 1109, rev den 308 Or 466 (1989), is wholly unpersuasive. That is hardly surprising, because there is no rational way to make a distinction.

    I dissent.

Document Info

Docket Number: C89-11-36711; CA A65260

Citation Numbers: 838 P.2d 1100, 115 Or. App. 440, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1852

Judges: Richardson, Joseph, Deits

Filed Date: 10/14/1992

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/13/2024