People v. Trujillo ( 1974 )

MR. JUSTICE GROVES

dissenting:

I concur in the affirmance of the robbery conviction and respectfully dissent as to the other conviction.

In my view, there was no evidence that he carried a concealed weapon and the result is not properly inferable from the evidence. I would follow People v. Beason, 342 Ill. App. 621, 97 N.E.2d 603 (1951), which is precisely in point, and would reverse the conviction as to the weapon charge.

MR. JUSTICE ERICKSON concurs in this dissent.