Store Properties, Inc. v. Neal , 72 Cal. App. 2d 112 ( 1945 )

WILSON, J.

I concur in the judgment on the ground that neither Exhibit A nor Exhibit B referred to in the opinion of the Presiding Justice nor the two documents together constitute a valid agreement which may be enforced in an action for specific performance. (See Harper v. Goldschmidt, 156 Cal. 245, 256 et seq. [104 P. 451, 134 Am.St.Rep. 124, 28 L.R.A. N.S. 689].) I do not express any opinion as to whether either or both documents may form the basis of an action for damages for nonperformance.

McComb, J., concurred.