Tanksley v. State , 113 Nev. 844 ( 1997 )


Menu:
  • Springer, J.,

    dissenting:

    I agree that the judgment of conviction should be affirmed. I do not join in Justice Rose’s analysis of the sentencing in this case; but, based on my reading of the record, I agree that the sentence is excessive and that the case should be remanded for re-sentencing.

Document Info

Docket Number: 27094

Citation Numbers: 944 P.2d 240, 113 Nev. 844, 1997 Nev. LEXIS 126

Judges: Shearing, Rose, Springer, Young, Maupin

Filed Date: 8/28/1997

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024