HASTINGS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. State Farm Insurance Company , 177 Mich. App. 428 ( 1989 )

Murphy, J.

(concurring). I concur to the extent that the trial court’s finding of involvement by all four automobiles is not clearly erroneous; further, the court in apportioning responsibility for no-fault benefits equally among the four insurers accomplished the equitable distribution of loss required by MCL 500.3114(6); MSA 24.13114(6). Accordingly, I would affirm the trial court.