Conservatorship of Valerie N. , 40 Cal. 3d 143 ( 1985 )


Menu:
  • REYNOSO, J.

    I concur and dissent. I concur in the affirmance of the judgment. On this record Valerie should not be subjected to an operation. *170I dissent, based on much of the Chief Justice’s analysis, from the majority’s conclusion that the present statutory scheme denies the developmentally disabled the right of privacy. The Legislature, after study of the sad historical reality pertaining to sterilization of developmentally disabled, has decreed that those official actions cease. That was a prudent and constitutionally permitted legislative action.

Document Info

Docket Number: S.F. 24745

Citation Numbers: 707 P.2d 760, 40 Cal. 3d 143, 219 Cal. Rptr. 387, 1985 Cal. LEXIS 401

Judges: Grodin, Reynoso, Lucas, Bird

Filed Date: 10/21/1985

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/2/2024