Cartwright v. State , 1989 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 45 ( 1989 )


Menu:
  • PARKS, Presiding Judge,

    dissenting.

    I dissent for the reasons stated in my opinion in Dutton v. Dixon, 757 P.2d 376 (Okla.Crim.App.1988). I would emphasize that under 22 O.S.1981, § 3, the resentenc-ing provision codified at 21 O.S.Supp.1985, § 701.13(E)(2), is not to be applied retroactively “unless expressly so declared.” Because retroactivity was not “expressly so declared” by the Oklahoma Legislature, the resentencing amendment should not be applied retroactively. Dutton, 757 P.2d at 381.

Document Info

Docket Number: H-88-820

Citation Numbers: 778 P.2d 479, 1989 OK CR 41, 1989 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 45, 1989 WL 84537

Judges: Busséy, Lane, Brett, Lumpkin, Parks

Filed Date: 7/31/1989

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024