Mullins v. Thompson ( 2001 )

CARLEY, Justice,

concurring.

I concur in Division 1 of the majority opinion. I can concur in Division 2 and in the judgment only because this Court has very recently held that a motion for new trial based upon improper argument must be made at the time of the alleged improper argument and that a motion made at the conclusion of the argument is not timely. Butler v. State, 273 Ga. 380, 384 (8) (541 SE2d 653) (2001).

I am authorized to state that Presiding Justice Sears joins in this opinion.