State v. Fearing ( 1981 )


Menu:
  • Justice CARLTON

    concurring.

    I am in the majority solely because of our prior decisions. I wish to join Justice HUSKINS in urging the General Assembly to revise G.S. 20-166 to clarify its meaning and intent. The interpretation of G.S. 20-166 argued by the State and expressed in Justice Huskins’ dissent is clearly what the law ought to be.

    Justice Exum joins in the concurring opinion.

Document Info

Docket Number: 28

Judges: Britt, Huskins, Carlton, Branch, Meyer, Exum

Filed Date: 12/1/1981

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/11/2024