Middleton v. State ( 2002 )


Menu:
  • Barnes, Judge,

    concurring specially.

    Although I concur fully in Divisions 2 and 3 of the majority opinion and with most of the analysis in Division 1,1 cannot concur fully in that Division because I believe reaching the result achieved by the majority requires overruling Brooks v. State, 243 Ga. App. 246 (532 SE2d 763) (2000). See id. at 253-258 (Barnes, J., dissenting).

Document Info

Docket Number: A01A2219

Judges: Barnes, Blackburn, Mikell, Miller, Phipps, Pope, Smith

Filed Date: 3/29/2002

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/8/2024