Bostic v. State , 184 Ga. App. 509 ( 1987 )

Beasley, Judge,

concurring specially.

I concur fully in Division 1, which although it is not explicit, holds that Bostic’s enumeration on the general grounds, as well as Thompson’s on the denial of his motion for directed verdict, bears with it no merit.

I fully concur in the remaining divisions also, except the application of the harmless error rule at the end of Division 5. There is no need to resort to it since we hold that the court did not err. Moreover, while to some the evidence may be compelling, conflicts within it may cause others pause.

Decided October 14, 1987. Kenneth D. Feldman, for appellant (case no. 74760). Roger L. Curry, for appellant (case no. 75218). Thomas J. Charron, District Attorney, Debra H. Bernes, Nancy I. Jordan, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.