Doyal Development Co. v. Blair , 234 Ga. 261 ( 1975 )


Menu:
  • Per curiam.

    In our opinion findings of fact and conclusions of law required by Code Ann. § 81A-152 (a) are mandatory. Ga. L. 1969, pp. 645, 646; 1970, pp. 170, 171. Statements to the contrary appearing in Faucette v. Faucette, 228 Ga. 201 (184 SE2d 586) and Collins v. Collins, 231 Ga. 683 (1) (203 SE2d 524) are disapproved. The conclusions of law entered nunc pro tunc by the trial court were not considered by the Court of Appeals and are not considered here. See Jacobs Pharmacy Co. v. Richard & Associates, Inc., 229 Ga. 156 (1) (189 SE2d 853); Warren v. Walton, 231 Ga. 495, 500 (2) (202 SE2d 405).

    Judgment reversed.

    All the Justices concur, except Nichols, C. J., and Undercofler, P. J., who dissent.

Document Info

Docket Number: 29717

Citation Numbers: 215 S.E.2d 471, 234 Ga. 261, 1975 Ga. LEXIS 1105

Judges: Nichols, Undercofler, Ingram, Hall

Filed Date: 4/29/1975

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024