Hall v. State , 262 Ga. 596 ( 1992 )

Benham, Justice,

concurring.

I concur separately to point out that while there is some evidence to support appellant’s allegation of selective prosecution, that evidence is insufficient under both the intentional discrimination standard adopted by this court in State v. Causey, 246 Ga. 735 (2) (273 SE2d 6) (1980), and the disparate treatment standard utilized in State v. Russell, __ Minn __ (477 NW2d 886) (1991). Accordingly, I join the majority in affirming the trial court’s judgment.

Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Carl P. Greenberg, Charles W. Smegal, Joseph F. Burford, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.