State v. Johnson , 119 Wash. 2d 167 ( 1992 )

Andersen, J.

(dissenting) — I read the statute to require that before there can be a conviction for violating it, there must first be proof that the premises involved were "being used for prostitution" and that the defendant knew of that use.

I would thus reverse and remand for a new trial in which the State would be required to prove all the elements of this crime. See WPIC 48.08.

Guy and Johnson, JJ., concur with Andersen, J.