-
GILLETTE, J., concurring in part.
It is axiomatic that courts do not reach constitutional questions unless they must. In this case, it is not necessary to do so: defendant’s failure to comply with the provisions of ORS 29.060 — whether or not that statute is constitutional — is a sufficient basis upon which to affirm the judgment for plaintiff. I concur in that portion of the lead opinion which so holds. On the other hand, I cannot join in the majority’s long discussion on the constitutional ramifications of the statute. That discussion may be correct; it is certainly unnecessary.
Document Info
Docket Number: 78-1927, CA 13338
Citation Numbers: 603 P.2d 1183, 43 Or. App. 595, 1979 Ore. App. LEXIS 3445
Judges: Buttler, Gillette, Roberts
Filed Date: 12/10/1979
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024