Puget Sound Gillnetters Ass'n v. Moos , 92 Wash. 2d 939 ( 1979 )


Menu:
  • Rosellini, J.

    (concurring) — I concur in the result of Justice Horowitz' opinion. I do this not because I believe that the interpretation of the Indian treaties by the United States Supreme Court is correct, but because I am compelled to do so by the supremacy clause of the United *956States Constitution. If I were not bound by the supremacy clause, I would adopt Justice Powell's dissent in Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Ass'n, 443 U.S. 658, 61 L. Ed. 2d 823, 99 S. Ct. 3055 (1979).

    Brachtenbach and Hicks, JJ., concur with Rosellini, J.

    Reconsideration denied April 2, 1980,.

Document Info

Docket Number: 44401, 46342

Citation Numbers: 603 P.2d 819, 92 Wash. 2d 939, 1979 Wash. LEXIS 1463

Judges: Horowitz, Utter, Wright, Dolliver, Williams, Ryan, Tern, Brachtenbach, Hicks, Rosellini

Filed Date: 11/30/1979

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024