Commonwealth v. MacK , 466 Pa. 12 ( 1976 )


Menu:
  • POMEROY, Justice

    (concurring).

    I agree that the guilty plea colloquy which preceded the trial court’s acceptance of appellant’s plea of guilty was inadequate under the standards prevailing at the *15time the plea was entered. I am also of opinion that the Court properly reached the merits of appellant’s challenge to his guilty plea, despite the fact that no petition to withdraw the plea was filed in the trial court. See my concurring opinion in Commonwealth v. Rodgers, 465 Pa. 379, 386, 350 A.2d 815 (1974). Accordingly, I concur in the reversal of the order of the Superior Court affirming the judgment of sentence and in the remanding of the case for a new trial.

    MANDERINO, J., joins in this concurring opinion.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 351 A.2d 278, 466 Pa. 12, 1976 Pa. LEXIS 449

Judges: Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino

Filed Date: 1/29/1976

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024