-
Concurring Opinion by
Mr. Justice Roberts: In my view, a trial judge’s expression of his opinion of the degree of an accused’s guilt usurps the function of the jury. I would hold that this sort of expression of opinion by a trial judge denies the accused his right to trial by an impartial jury. See Commonwealth v. Ewell, 456 Pa. 589, 600, 319 A.2d 153, 158 (1974) (concurring opinion of this writer, joined by Manderino, J.); Commonwealth v. Archambault, 448 Pa. 90, 290 A.2d 72 (1972); Commonwealth v. Motley, 448 Pa. 110, 289 A.2d 724 (1972); ABA Project on Standards for Criminal Justice, Standards Relating to the Function of the Trial Judge §5.6(a) (Approved Draft, 1972).
I concur in the result.
Mr. Justice Manderino joins in this concurring opinion.
Document Info
Docket Number: Appeal, 578
Citation Numbers: 457 Pa. 594, 321 A.2d 913, 1974 Pa. LEXIS 876
Judges: Roberts, Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Eoberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino
Filed Date: 7/1/1974
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/13/2024