Farris v. McKune , 259 Kan. 181 ( 1996 )

Six, J.,

concurring: The majority opinion holds that the consolidated cases now before the court are controlled by State v. Fierro, 257 Kan. 639, 895 P. 2d 186 (1995). I agree. I wrote a concurring and dissenting opinion in Fierro, which was joined by only one other member of the court. I am obliged to follow the law as stated in Fierro.