Palmer v. Warren , 108 F.2d 164 ( 1940 )

On Petition for Rehearing.

PER CURIAM.

Our opinion seems to have been misunderstood and perhaps was not clear. We agree with the New Haven if it means no more than that the Boston & .Providence cannot now procure any change by the Commission in the “Segregation Formula” itself. However, we meant to decide before, and we now decide again, that the Boston & Providence is free to oppose the application by the District Court of that formula to the liquidation of its account with the debtors as freely as though Order No. 300 had not been entered.