Rocco v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board , 1999 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 89 ( 1999 )

PELLEGRINI, Judge,

concurring.

I join the majority but add that counsel’s confusion in filing a “notice of appeal” that does not require a statement of objections rather than a “petition for review” is due to the confusion created by Chapter 15’s use of a petition for review to invoke both original and appellate jurisdiction. Revisions of Chapter 15 have been pending before the Appellate Rules Committee for some time. I urge that the Committee examine those revisions to eliminate that confusion.