Hamilton v. State , 1965 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1159 ( 1965 )

MORRISON, Judge

(dissenting).

I agreed to the reformation of the sentence in Haines v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 391 S.W.2d 58, because the indictments were not introduced in the cases which were there alleged for enhancement. They were in Rogers v. State, 169 Tex.Cr.R. 239, 333 S.W.2d 383, and they are in the case before us here. I adhere to my views expressed in my dissent in Rogers v. State, supra.