Egan v. Woodell , 1986 Tex. App. LEXIS 9300 ( 1986 )

CADENA, Chief Justice,

dissenting.

I disagree. The undisputed evidence shows that maintenance of the gate is necessary in order to prevent appellants’ cattle from wandering from appellants’ land and onto lands of appellants’ neighbors, who complained to appellants concerning their failure to control the cattle. The injunction clearly bars appellants from reasonably using their land for the purpose of grazing their cattle.